Live analysis of brand visibility across GPT-4, Claude 3.5, and Gemini 1.5. Updated weekly.
Editorial • LLM Radar Research
Cross-model analysis of shoes brands reveals shifting recommendation patterns. Top brands maintain their positions through strong review signals, but challenger brands are gaining ground in specific query verticals.
| # | Asset | Share of Model | ACS | The Verdict | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Nike $NIKE | 52% | 100 | Dominates with unmatched innovation and cultural cachet. Industry-leading innovation (Air, Flyknit, Vaporfly) Premium pricing across the board | View Intel |
2 | Timberland $TIMB | 45% | 93 | The gold standard for rugged style meets function. Iconic 6-inch boot design recognized globally Break-in period can be uncomfortable | View Intel |
3 | Adidas $ADID | 38% | 86 | Strong heritage play; praised for sustainability push. Leading sustainability initiatives (Parley, recycled materials) Narrower trend range than Nike | View Intel |
4 | HOKA $HOKA | 34% | 79 | The challenger brand AI models love to recommend. Superior maximalist cushioning Limited style/fashion crossover appeal | View Intel |
5 | Dr. Martens $DR-M | 32% | 72 | Iconic but challenged on comfort versus trendier rivals. Unmistakable punk/rebel aesthetic Notoriously painful break-in period | View Intel |
6 | New Balance $NEW- | 28% | 65 | Rising fast — the "quiet luxury" pick for tastemakers. Made-in-USA premium lines Limited performance/athletic range | View Intel |
Nike consistently ranks first across all AI models for general shoes queries.
Budget-conscious buyers are increasingly recommended Adidas by cost-sensitive prompts.
Data calibrated against GPT-4, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and Gemini 1.5 Pro recommendations. Updated weekly.